Blog

Recent posts
- Landlord Diaries: The Mask of the Model Tenant
- Landlord Diaries: How the System Punishes the Responsible and Rewards the Lawless
- Landlord Diaries: The Kindness Quotes and the Flea-Sucking Troll
- Landlord Diaries: The Girl, the P House, and the Aussie Property Manager
- Landlord Diaries: Fraud, Fibs, and a 3-Bedroom House That Never Existed
They looked great on paper.
Polite. Passionate about animals. Charming, even.
They spoke kindly. Said they were grateful for the opportunity to live in my home and run their small business. They even told me my dog would always be welcome.
On the surface, they seemed like ideal tenants — warm, responsible, committed.
But behind that carefully crafted image was a very different reality.
Rent wasn’t paid — not for weeks, then months.
The property was used for purposes never agreed to.
Requests were ignored. Agreements were broken.
And when I finally asked them to pay what they owed or leave, the charm vanished.
That’s when the insults began.
I was called names. Accused of being greedy, unstable, heartless.
Because in their minds, I wasn’t a person anymore — just a greedy landlord. A target. An obstacle between them and what they felt entitled to.
The Real Cost of the Illusion
It’s one thing to be lied to.
It’s another to be gaslit — to have people paint themselves as victims while using your home, refusing to pay, and publicly accusing you of cruelty just for asking them to honor a legal agreement.
What’s worse is that the system supports this.
Despite clear breaches, the law gave them more time.
Despite the arrears, the damage, the intimidation — I had to wait.
File more paperwork. Follow every step. Be patient. Be professional.
While they twisted the truth and played the system to its fullest.
This Isn’t a One-Off
I wish I could say this was unusual. It’s not.
Landlords all over the country are dealing with this dual reality:
-
The public-facing image of tenants who "just need a break"
-
And the behind-the-scenes nightmare of unpaid rent, damaged homes, and hostile standoffs.
And yet, the narrative still so often paints landlords as villains — faceless, heartless, loaded with power.
That’s not the story I’m living.
I’m just someone trying to protect my home, cover my mortgage, and hold people accountable.
Why I’m Sharing This
I’m not here to name names. I’m here to name patterns.
Because this isn’t just about one tenant or one story.
It’s about the growing number of landlords being manipulated by people who know how to play the system — and play it well.
It’s about the emotional toll of being lied to while still trying to do the right thing.
It’s about a tenancy system that’s lost balance — where accountability is optional and kindness gets punished.
So if you’re a landlord walking through something similar — you’re not alone.
And if you’ve never experienced this, don’t assume the surface always tells the truth.
Sometimes the kindest faces hide the most damage.


loading...


People often say, “You poor thing—those tenants are terrible!”
Because, regardless of how bad your tenants are—how dishonest, how manipulative, how brazenly criminal—they’ve been handed the ultimate weapon: a tenancy system that gives them time, sympathy, and loopholes, while landlords are left bleeding.
They can stop paying rent for weeks or months. They can promise to leave, then change their minds at the last minute. They can use your home as a business, kennel, dump, or drug lab. And when you finally get to Tribunal—after jumping through every procedural hoop—there’s still no guarantee of immediate consequences.
I’m not exaggerating when I say: some tenants have more rights squatting in your house than you do owning it.
The real heartbreak?
It’s not just the money (though losing thousands in unpaid rent and legal costs cuts deep). It’s the powerlessness. The slow grind of bureaucracy that tells you to wait while they steal your income, your time, and your peace of mind.
Here’s what I’ve come to realise: it’s not just about bad tenants. It’s about a tenancy system that protects and enables them to keep stealing from people like me.
Let me walk you through my reality.
I filed with Tenancy Services in March.
I had an ineffective hearing in April.
Then another hearing in June, which finally resulted in an order for immediate possession and arrears.
I could have enforced it immediately, but I was lenient. I gave them three days to leave. Then, when they asked, I gave them another three.
That turned into a whole extra week of free rent in my home.
And guess what? After all that, they turned around and said, “We’re not leaving.”
I know you are thinking, "Why did I give them yet another chance?" But I need to be able to sleep at night, and they were once again very convincing in their arguments.
So I had to apply for an eviction warrant—another week of free rent while the paperwork was processed.
And now I wait for a bailiff, which could mean yet another week… or more.
All the while, they live in my house, rent-free, despite breaking the law and breaching the contract.
Let me be clear: they legally should have left the premises weeks ago.
But the system says I must follow a legal process, and that takes weeks.
This is how landlords are slowly financially gutted—not just by dishonest tenants, but by a government and legal structure that rewards non-compliance and punishes responsibility.
They tell us we’re protected. But in reality?
Landlords are left holding the costs, the stress, and the legal limbo, while tenants who break the rules continue to live on our dime.
It’s not just unfair. It’s state-sanctioned theft.
And it’s happening every day in homes just like mine.
If we want change, we need to speak up. Loudly. Because behind every “bad tenant” story is a silent system quietly enabling them—and it’s landlords who pay the price.


loading...


They said OBie and I would always be welcome.
They said they were grateful.
They said a lot of things.
Until I asked them to do one simple, reasonable thing:
Pay the rent they had agreed to.
From that moment on, I was no longer the kind, accommodating landlord who let them run a business from my home, live rent-free for weeks, and turn my property into their own kingdom.
No — I became a “disgusting troll”,
a “flea sucking the life out of everything”,
and, my personal favourite, someone who was “acting in a drug-addled manner.”
All because I asked them to honour the contract they signed.
Because I was upset that I couldn’t afford to pay the mortgage and insurance while they were refusing to pay thousands in arrears.
They locked me out of my own property.
They denied access for inspections and basic maintenance.
They lived in my home without paying rent, and I was borrowing money from friends just to cover the expenses.
And then — they took to Facebook.
Posting quotes about kindness. Compassion. Karma.
(Actual screenshots below, because I couldn’t write satire this good.)
“Shoutout to people whose kindness isn’t a strategy but a way of life.”
“I’m so sick of ugly. Not looks. Ugly hearts. Ugly actions.”
Apparently, the irony was lost on them.
This isn’t a tale of bitterness.
It’s a tale of how warped the landlord narrative has become — where kindness is mistaken for weakness, contracts are treated as suggestions, and any effort to protect your home is painted as cruelty.
They weren’t victims of a greedy landlord.
They were beneficiaries of one who gave them trust, flexibility, and patience — and got malice in return.
But here’s the thing:
Karma doesn’t need a key.
And it never forgets an address.


loading...


This story is part of my series: “A Day in the Life of a New Zealand Landlord.” For more behind-the-scenes truths from the rental front lines, stay tuned. The next chapter might be funnier — or worse.
Ah, the joys of being a landlord in New Zealand. Where every week is a new episode of “You Just Can’t Make This Stuff Up.”
Meet Crystal (no pun intended, but fitting, you’ll see why) and her boyfriend Dylan—young, sweet, and utterly clueless. They rented my house, and things were fine… until Uncle Meth moved in. Yep, turns out Uncle had a bit of a P habit, and soon enough, so did my house.
I did the responsible thing: tested the property, confirmed contamination, and sadly had to ask Crystal and Dylan to leave. To their credit, they didn’t trash the place, but the yard and garage looked like a rummage sale collided with a hurricane. Oh, and they stopped paying rent. By the time they left (a few weeks later), they owed me about $1,800.
Fast forward a few days, and I get a call from Crystal. She’s breathless with excitement:
“Dylan let me down on the outside, but I cleaned the inside real good! And guess what—I borrowed the money to pay you!”
My hardened landlord heart softened. She arrived at 7 p.m. with the rent. We shared a cup of tea. I thought, Maybe I’ve misjudged her. Maybe there’s hope here.
Nope. Hope is a dangerous thing.
Half an hour after leaving, Crystal calls again.
“Can you call this property manager, Joy, and tell her I paid you? She said we can have this new house if we clear our rent!”
Wait, What? Did I just get used as a rental reference?! There’s a Property Manager who is going to give her a house, knowing she has a history of rent arrears and ‘P’? Seriously?
The next morning, I ring Joy, an Aussie with no-nonsense charm who’s seen it all. Joy laughs and says,
“Yeah, I told them that. We just wanted to get you paid. But no way they’re getting the house. This would never happen in Australia! Tenants get away with murder here!”
And she’s right. In NZ, the rules tilt so far against landlords, the Tenancy Tribunal hands tenants a few extra weeks' rent free on the way out the door. Compliments of the Landlord! Thank you very much!
Moral of the story? Even when you get the rent, you might still be the punchline.


loading...


Some tenancy disputes test your patience.
Others test your faith in humanity.
This one did both — and then some.
It began simply enough.
My commercial tenant, Honest Tom, a hardworking man who just wanted to get on with life and avoid unnecessary drama, sublet part of his rented property (with our blessing) — the office space, which was semi-liveable. It had a kitchen area and toilet. We later added a bathroom for his tenant.
Enter Tallulah Twaddle: all smiles, stories, and the kind of creative imagination that should have earned her a spot writing fiction, not tenancy agreements. Oh that’s right, there was no written agreement, there wasn’t even a legible rent book.
Unfortunately, when Honest Tom reduced the size of the commercial area he was renting off us, we unintentionally inherited the squatting, non-rent-paying, abusive and entitled Tallulah Twaddle and it was up to us to get rid of her. Had she agreed to sign an agreement and pay the rent she could have stayed.
So, Off we headed to Tenancy Tribunal, thinking “She’s not our tenant. Tom gave her notice when he was leaving. She’s not paying rent. I have all the supporting evidence in writing. Should be a walk in the Park.” WRONG.
Thus began a four-year saga that could have been avoided with a little honesty, a little integrity — and perhaps several adjudicator’s ability to see through her well-rehearsed performance.
Here is one little gem worth the share and a chuckle …
Shortly after moving in, Tallulah sent Honest Tom a now-infamous text:
"Hi Tom, I'm off to WINZ today. In case they phone you before I speak to you, I’m telling them the rent is $380 for a 3-bedroom house."
Reality check:
There was no house. Technically, there were two bedrooms. She was paying $250.00 per week.
There was, however, a substantial misrepresentation designed to deceive a government agency.
When this little gem surfaced at the Tribunal hearing, Tallulah didn’t deny it.
She simply shrugged and said: "I know, but I'm dealing with that and WINZ at the moment."
As if fraud were a minor speed bump on the way to a payout.
The adjudicator, who by this point looked ready to take up meditation or whisky-tasting full-time, asked the obvious: “That being said. How can I believe anything else you say in your statement?”
Tallulah, without missing a beat, assured him: "Oh, but everything else is true!"
Four hours later, after more circular arguments than a roundabout convention, the adjudicator said the case was to be ruled in my favour.
Tallulah cried out: "But the other adjudicator said I would get my money!"
(For the record: NOT. He said she could try arguing the case.)
So our current adjudicator said the matter should technically have been heard by the original adjudicator, and therefore the entire 4-hour hearing was struck from the record, and we were to go back to the original adjudicator to cover the same ground in another couple of months.
If there’s a moral to this story, it’s this:
In the world of tenancy disputes, the truth is often stranger than fiction.
And trust, once misplaced, can cost you more than just time — it can cost you years of your life you’ll never get back.


loading...

